Quote ref MDW1
Class 2a Medical Device
Clinical Trials
An article in the American Journal of Pain Management recently published the findings of Health Care Practitioners on a total of 500 patients who used a leading micro-current therapy device. Some of their amazing results are as follows:
Additional statistics were also taken from 2,500 peers with marked reviews indicating significant changes in all cases involving pain from Carpal Tunnel, Fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression, Myofacial pain, RSD, TMJ and Arthritis. In each case, 100% had significant improvement and relief from Their pin after using a micro-current therapy device
An article in the American Journal of Pain Management recently published the findings of Health Care Practitioners on a total of 500 patients who used a leading micro-current therapy device. Some of their amazing results are as follows:
- Pain was significantly improved by 91%;
- Anxiety was relieved by 93% and depression by 89%;
- Stress was reduced by 93% and insomnia diminished by 79%;
- Headaches reduced by 90%; and
- Muscle tension relieved by 95%.
Additional statistics were also taken from 2,500 peers with marked reviews indicating significant changes in all cases involving pain from Carpal Tunnel, Fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression, Myofacial pain, RSD, TMJ and Arthritis. In each case, 100% had significant improvement and relief from Their pin after using a micro-current therapy device
Study undertaken by Canterbury Christ Church University College in association with the Department of Orthopaedics at the Kent
and Canterbury Hospital Canterbury. The Department of Physiotherapy was also involved.
Following ethical approval from the local Hospital Ethics Committee a number of patients were selected at random for the study. All the patients recruited had a diagnosis OA of the knee and had been suffering for a period of longer than one year. The patients were in a similar age range being between 55 years and 70 years old.
A double blind method was used. This means that neither the patients nor the researcher were aware whether they were using a MicroDoctor® that was delivering the treatment or an identical looking unit that was not. Because patients do not feel the treatments they could not guess whether they were given a working unit or not. They looked and acted in an identical manner. Therefore, some patients would receive a placebo treatment and act as the control group.
A person not in contact with the patients allocated units to each patient. In this way when the results were given to the researcher by the patients he was not aware if the patients had had treatment or not.
Each patient was given a questionnaire to complete at the beginning of the study and then during the treatment period and at its completion. Simple questions were asked such as the levels of pain, swelling and how much mobility the patient had. Each patient used the MicroDoctor® every day for two weeks.
Following ethical approval from the local Hospital Ethics Committee a number of patients were selected at random for the study. All the patients recruited had a diagnosis OA of the knee and had been suffering for a period of longer than one year. The patients were in a similar age range being between 55 years and 70 years old.
A double blind method was used. This means that neither the patients nor the researcher were aware whether they were using a MicroDoctor® that was delivering the treatment or an identical looking unit that was not. Because patients do not feel the treatments they could not guess whether they were given a working unit or not. They looked and acted in an identical manner. Therefore, some patients would receive a placebo treatment and act as the control group.
A person not in contact with the patients allocated units to each patient. In this way when the results were given to the researcher by the patients he was not aware if the patients had had treatment or not.
Each patient was given a questionnaire to complete at the beginning of the study and then during the treatment period and at its completion. Simple questions were asked such as the levels of pain, swelling and how much mobility the patient had. Each patient used the MicroDoctor® every day for two weeks.
From the patients that received the dummy placebo treatment 80% reported no significant changes in their symptoms in terms of pain, swelling or their mobility.
From the patients that received the micro-current treatment:
73% reported:
- a significant improvement in their symptoms
- had less discomfort and were as result more mobile.
Simply click here to watch this amazing video..
